home
Reported that the United States
Military strike against Syria want not only by many American protests, the British House of Commons also voted against the British aid U.S. military intervention against Syria. Reuters August 31 commented that the United Kingdom on the Syrian issue, "rebellion", or serious damage to Anglo-American relations.
In comments at the beginning
The issue of "whether there are likely to become the UK in the future U.S. military intervention partner" of the question. Commented that this is not the British partner, the United States still will not hesitate to act.
France became a U.S. number one hot new friends, Turkey may also become America's new partner.
Britain in many international affairs has always been the only U.S. lead. British Prime Minister David Cameron said that Britain remained firmly opposed to the Syrian Assad regime, strongly condemned the use of chemical weapons, give humanitarian aid with Syria.
British Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne
• describe the relationship between the United States and Britain have said: "The Anglo-American cooperation in all sectors with the oldest and most profound friendship."
President Obama is also in May 2011 in a speech said that the Anglo-American China is "the world's longest known and most robust partner."
However, comments that, since the United States and Britain after World War II on many issues and have a "friction" for example, Britain, France, Israel and Egypt, the Suez Canal War, the Vietnam War, the U.S. invasion of Grenada war, but these are not of the bilateral relations significant impact.
A former British ambassador, said the use of force whether Syria, United States and Britain to become the critical moment, not just "embarrassing episode" was.
Analysts said the U.S. military is willing to do the British partner, the British people will have to withstand the pressure of public opinion. People not in the mood to ignore what the future threat, they are concerned about possible participation in the Syrian military strike risk.
• Former British Foreign Minister Jack Straw said the shadow of the war in Iraq, "the Englishman misgivings," former British Foreign Office adviser Michael
• William said that he was worried that after the overthrow of Assad's government, replaced by the government will be worse, Syria minorities, such as Christians, Druze, Kurdish and Alawi will be in jeopardy.
British lawmakers charged with the responsibility to represent the people, polls show the British people against the participation of the Syrian military strike.
Commented that the United States still acts as a "world policeman" role, while the British have no such obligation, and now there is no such capability.
Military strike against Syria want not only by many American protests, the British House of Commons also voted against the British aid U.S. military intervention against Syria. Reuters August 31 commented that the United Kingdom on the Syrian issue, "rebellion", or serious damage to Anglo-American relations.
In comments at the beginning
The issue of "whether there are likely to become the UK in the future U.S. military intervention partner" of the question. Commented that this is not the British partner, the United States still will not hesitate to act.
France became a U.S. number one hot new friends, Turkey may also become America's new partner.
Britain in many international affairs has always been the only U.S. lead. British Prime Minister David Cameron said that Britain remained firmly opposed to the Syrian Assad regime, strongly condemned the use of chemical weapons, give humanitarian aid with Syria.
British Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne
• describe the relationship between the United States and Britain have said: "The Anglo-American cooperation in all sectors with the oldest and most profound friendship."
President Obama is also in May 2011 in a speech said that the Anglo-American China is "the world's longest known and most robust partner."
However, comments that, since the United States and Britain after World War II on many issues and have a "friction" for example, Britain, France, Israel and Egypt, the Suez Canal War, the Vietnam War, the U.S. invasion of Grenada war, but these are not of the bilateral relations significant impact.
A former British ambassador, said the use of force whether Syria, United States and Britain to become the critical moment, not just "embarrassing episode" was.
Analysts said the U.S. military is willing to do the British partner, the British people will have to withstand the pressure of public opinion. People not in the mood to ignore what the future threat, they are concerned about possible participation in the Syrian military strike risk.
• Former British Foreign Minister Jack Straw said the shadow of the war in Iraq, "the Englishman misgivings," former British Foreign Office adviser Michael
• William said that he was worried that after the overthrow of Assad's government, replaced by the government will be worse, Syria minorities, such as Christians, Druze, Kurdish and Alawi will be in jeopardy.
British lawmakers charged with the responsibility to represent the people, polls show the British people against the participation of the Syrian military strike.
Commented that the United States still acts as a "world policeman" role, while the British have no such obligation, and now there is no such capability.
AS&GG.jpg)
Home
Post a Comment