home
While the U.S. military intervention in Syria sharpening initiated when the British lower house of parliament voted against the government's military intervention against Syria move, British Prime Minister David Cameron said the government would "act accordingly."
As a long time in international affairs in order to follow the United States to defend the dignity of the British Empire, an ally of the United Kingdom does not coincide with the move to release a meaningful signal to the United States as a world leader began to loosen, Americans irresponsible recklessness action will probably sounded the death knell of American empire dominance.
Since World War II, the United States has been able to do anything in international affairs, depends on three factors: First, the U.S. super comprehensive national strength, especially after the Cold War, the United States a super-dominant position of the American empire connivance ambition, arrogance on the international stage once known to the world, and even from time to time reveal reckless "unilateralism" a la carte diplomacy, the international community silent resentment.
The second is a strong ally of the United States system. In Europe, the North Atlantic Treaty system, provide Americans with a powerful backing, especially followed step by step of the "special relationship", so the United States have nothing to fear. Third, the United States personally created international institutional system, including the UN, WTO, IMF, World Bank, and a series of international control system. With these three elements constitute prominent strength, the Americans won the honor of leading the world.
However, entering the new century, the United States rude and arrogant impunity allowed suffered terribly, after the American empire building after being hit again and again, showing the crumbling of the situation. First, the "9.11" terrorist attacks, the U.S. homeland security myth was broken, the United States launched the "In my dash" war on terror, but bypassing the United Nations and a series of acts of the international system, triggering from France and Germany and other continental national boycott, the U.S. alliance system falter.
Later, the 2008 financial crisis dealt a heavy blow to the U.S. overall national strength, the United States created by hand in weakening the international system, not only can not be achieved to conquer the world, even things that are your own home clash, the U.S. strategic community began to indulge in an international declining influence of fear among.
Perhaps, as Brzezinski in the "big failure and chaos," I said it: "The United States can not become a global policeman, but also when not a global bankers, and even global moralists can be done because the first class needs justifiably legitimacy; second foundation is to have solvency; while the third category will need their own innocence. "In fact, the British parliament voted to send troops to Syria, the United States is fundamentally global police, the global bankers and global moralists status boycott, does not lie in its power to shock hit the U.S. on its own strength, but in the world that last half a century of the "Anglo-American special relationship" began to crack. U.S. can not let down international terrorism, the United States could not make him dislike leaders bow, and even America's closest ally, the United States can not afford to make it lead.
Ironically, it is precisely the United States he personally created this outcome. British Parliament rejected the Anglo-American alliance is not rejected, but rejected the U.S. reckless "no-interventionism" Foreign Policy. Syria aside disputes, whether right or wrong, the UN "responsibility to protect"
First by the UN Security Council to exercise all the actions bypassing the UN Security Council, not only there is no moral at all, and is likely to be on the existing international norms destruction. Especially in the United Nations is carrying out investigations and truth unknown circumstances, such impulse himself is a bigger irresponsible behavior.
Therefore, the British allies remind warned Americans back in the framework of the UN Security Council, to give more trouble may be released "new interventionism" Foreign Policy.
For the United States, other countries intervene to restrain the impulse of its own but is perhaps a good thing.
As a long time in international affairs in order to follow the United States to defend the dignity of the British Empire, an ally of the United Kingdom does not coincide with the move to release a meaningful signal to the United States as a world leader began to loosen, Americans irresponsible recklessness action will probably sounded the death knell of American empire dominance.
Since World War II, the United States has been able to do anything in international affairs, depends on three factors: First, the U.S. super comprehensive national strength, especially after the Cold War, the United States a super-dominant position of the American empire connivance ambition, arrogance on the international stage once known to the world, and even from time to time reveal reckless "unilateralism" a la carte diplomacy, the international community silent resentment.
The second is a strong ally of the United States system. In Europe, the North Atlantic Treaty system, provide Americans with a powerful backing, especially followed step by step of the "special relationship", so the United States have nothing to fear. Third, the United States personally created international institutional system, including the UN, WTO, IMF, World Bank, and a series of international control system. With these three elements constitute prominent strength, the Americans won the honor of leading the world.
However, entering the new century, the United States rude and arrogant impunity allowed suffered terribly, after the American empire building after being hit again and again, showing the crumbling of the situation. First, the "9.11" terrorist attacks, the U.S. homeland security myth was broken, the United States launched the "In my dash" war on terror, but bypassing the United Nations and a series of acts of the international system, triggering from France and Germany and other continental national boycott, the U.S. alliance system falter.
Later, the 2008 financial crisis dealt a heavy blow to the U.S. overall national strength, the United States created by hand in weakening the international system, not only can not be achieved to conquer the world, even things that are your own home clash, the U.S. strategic community began to indulge in an international declining influence of fear among.
Perhaps, as Brzezinski in the "big failure and chaos," I said it: "The United States can not become a global policeman, but also when not a global bankers, and even global moralists can be done because the first class needs justifiably legitimacy; second foundation is to have solvency; while the third category will need their own innocence. "In fact, the British parliament voted to send troops to Syria, the United States is fundamentally global police, the global bankers and global moralists status boycott, does not lie in its power to shock hit the U.S. on its own strength, but in the world that last half a century of the "Anglo-American special relationship" began to crack. U.S. can not let down international terrorism, the United States could not make him dislike leaders bow, and even America's closest ally, the United States can not afford to make it lead.
Ironically, it is precisely the United States he personally created this outcome. British Parliament rejected the Anglo-American alliance is not rejected, but rejected the U.S. reckless "no-interventionism" Foreign Policy. Syria aside disputes, whether right or wrong, the UN "responsibility to protect"
First by the UN Security Council to exercise all the actions bypassing the UN Security Council, not only there is no moral at all, and is likely to be on the existing international norms destruction. Especially in the United Nations is carrying out investigations and truth unknown circumstances, such impulse himself is a bigger irresponsible behavior.
Therefore, the British allies remind warned Americans back in the framework of the UN Security Council, to give more trouble may be released "new interventionism" Foreign Policy.
For the United States, other countries intervene to restrain the impulse of its own but is perhaps a good thing.
AS&GG.jpg)
Home
Post a Comment